Today, January 29, is my birthday, and it is also National Puzzle Day, and therefore a propitious time to write about my love for the double-crostic puzzle, specifically New York Times double-crostic puzzles, now called (to my mind incorrectly) the "Acrostic." I prefer to refer to these puzzles by a name previously used by the Times, the Kingsley Double-Crostic, in that they were invented by Elizabeth Kingsley (more on Ms. Kingsley later) who christened them double-crostics. I learned while researching this post that they have not been called Kingsley Double-Crostics for more than 50 years, since April 1972, when I was 15. I don't care.
My love of the the double-crostic even received a shout-out in our most recent holiday letter:
[Maria's] favorite left-brain activity is tackling those dastardly Sunday New York Times acrostic puzzles, which her father, who completed hundreds, maybe thousands, over his lifetime, taught her to do more than 50 years ago. (That she and Dan completed one of these puzzles only weeks after they started dating was an early sign they were meant for each other!).
(I used the hated "acrostic" in our letter only because that is what the Times currently calls it and didn't want to confuse people.)
I actually saved that first double-crostic Dan and I worked together. While I can't tell you exactly what day we did it, I can tell you that our first date was on May 4, 1984, and this puzzle is from the May 20, 1984 New York Times Magazine. Whether the romantic nature of doing that puzzle together had anything to do with it, let the record reflect that Dan proposed to me before the month was out.
Anyway, before I go any further, what exactly is a double-crostic??? It's a puzzle with two parts. The upper part looks like a crossword puzzle, with a space for each letter numbered consecutively. The bottom half of the puzzle contains clues where each letter in the clue's answer is numbered, requiring the puzzler to transfer that letter to the crossword puzzle part in the space with the corresponding number. The crossword puzzle part, when filled in, will be a quote, and (this is the actual acrostic part) the first letter of each clue will spell out the author and the title of the work from which the quote is taken.
As mentioned, my father, a lifelong devotee of Times crossword puzzles as well as double-crostics, taught me how to do both. My memory is that back in the day there were two puzzles on the weekly Sunday puzzle page, the regular crossword, and then either the double-crostic, Puns and Anagrams ("a variety cryptic crossword that relies heavily on wordplay, hidden words, and anagrams" created for many years by Mel Taub who just died this past September at the age of 97) or the Diagramless crossword. Dad also taught me to do Puns and Anagrams, but I can't remember whether he did the Diagramless as well. In any event, I recently learned that he also taught our son Quentin how to do double-crostics when, after reading a draft of our holiday letter, Quentin took issue where I had written that his grandfather did those puzzles "always in ink." Quentin remonstrated, saying that Papa had specifically told him that while he did standard crossword puzzles in ink (to discourage possible wrong guesses), he recommended doing double-crostics in pencil, as there would inevitably be changes and errors. This speaks to how difficult double-crostics can be, if my father would deign to use a pencil.
But who taught my father? I know that he told me that Ben Strumpf, the father of the family who rented the second floor of 19th North 10th Avenue after my grandfather died, when my father was still a boy, introduced him to The New York Times in general, so maybe he also got Dad hooked on its crossword puzzles and double-crostics? Or someone else, but who? Possibly one of his older brothers like Lou or Charlie? Or did he just discover the puzzle on his own? Ben Strumpf's only child, Emmanuel, "Manny," who Dad was very close to and who remained in touch with me after my father died, passed away a couple of years ago, so that question will likely remain forever unanswered. Regardless, whenever I am working on a double-crostic I find myself simultaneously feeling very close to my father and also really missing him. I recently found a large envelope in my father's handwriting reading “NY Times crostics, 11-22-98 to 8-26-2012.” In it are a slew of puzzles, each with the date of completion and a number -- apparently Dad kept track of how many puzzles he did. The last number appears to be 896, although I don’t know what year he started keeping track.
Double-crostics are challenging -- "dastardly" as I wrote in our holiday letter -- and their time-consuming complexity is partly why I love them so much. Sometimes you just flat-out know the answer to a clue ( "____ Stephens, 1960s housewife with a twitchy nose": SAMANTHA). Sometimes you think you might have the clue solved so you check to see if the letters go in logical places before filling it in: if H will be in the middle of a three-letter word, it's probably THE and you're likely home free; but say it would be the first letter of a word where the second letter is "P." A word starting with HP? Houston, we have a problem (although now and then a quirky letter combination will turn out to be right). You might check to see whether you accidentally put the "P" in the wrong space, which does happen with surprising regularity when you are transcribing 170-something letters per puzzle. It's this back-and-forth that I enjoy. A clue where the answer is likely a plural? Maybe I'll try filling in the "S" only and see if that helps me guess a word of the quote once I transfer it to the crossword section. Or let's say I've got enough of the quote that I think a particular word is likely a verb and the last letter is "D" - probably a past tense verb and the letter before "D" must be "E." Bit by bit the quote is taking shape. Bit by bit the author and name of the work is being filled in.
Then, finally, there's that wonderful lightbulb moment where several partly filled-in words suddenly coalesce into a phrase. __ __N __RA__ __I__CO is SAN FRANCISCO! And that phrase might then help you figure out the theme of the quote. The quote in question was indeed about San Francisco, and knowing that helped in eventually solving the puzzle. In another puzzle the lightbulb went off for Dan: THE M__ __ __ A__KING OF __I__ __AEL __AC__SO__ is THE MOONWALKING OF MICHAEL JACKSON! Then you take the new letters you just filled into the quote in the crossword section and put them down in the clue section. You know where to put each letter because each square in the quote has a letter and a number in tiny print in the top corners. The "M" square in MICHAEL JACKSON has A and 17. So an "M" goes below in Clue A above the number 17 which happens to be the first letter of the word. It's a five-letter word, starting with M, and the clue is "Relative of salsa." I had been thinking tango, but no, it must be MAMBO! So now I take the letters I just filled in to make MAMBO and put them up in the quote. Like I said, back and forth, bit by bit. So satisfying. Well, if you're like me it is. It occurs to me that this explanation may be somewhat or even completely incomprehensible. What can I say? I already told you double-crostics are complex. They sometimes even contain words, both in the quote or in the clues, that neither of us has ever heard of -- INUPIAQ, AMPHIGORY, LOGOPHILE, PHUDNIK -- which must be filled in painstakingly, letter by letter.
Here is the most recent double-crostic I completed, along with Dan, from the January 25, 2026 NYT Magazine:
This puzzle (which contained the above-mentioned PHUDNIK in the quote) had an additional fun twist courtesy of the puzzlemakers: a number of the clues pertain to the theme of the quote. SCHLOCK? TV host born with the surname Leibowitz? LATKE? This puzzle must have something to do with Jews or Judaism! So could N __ __ __ IK possibly be the Yiddish word NUDNIK? Oh yes it could! And the quote turned out to be from a book by the late Leo Rosten, expert in all things Yiddish, The Joys of Yinglish.
Dan and I usually work on these puzzles together for a while and when he, the early bird, goes to bed, I, the night owl, finish them up -- unless I can't, as it often takes us a few days to complete a puzzle, adamant closed-book double-crostic aficionados that we are. Although almost every puzzle contains clues that could be solved with a quick Google search: "Capital of Kazakhstan"? ASTANA; “Stepmother’s cat in Disney's Cinderella”? LUCIFER, we are purists and refuse to do so. We do, however, soften this rigid stance with a house rule: if one of us is pretty sure we know the correct answer to a clue, we allow ourselves to use the Internet to confirm it before filling it in.
I can't imagine who is still reading this extremely geeky post (nothing like listening to someone rag on about their passion while the reader's eyes glaze over), but I can't wrap it up without talking about Elizabeth Seelman Kingsley (1871-1957), who singlehandedly invented the double-crostic. Kingsley attended a Wellesley College reunion in the early 1930s where she was dismayed to learn that students were embracing "20th century scribblers" like James Joyce and Gertrude Stein. According to her New York Times obituary, she went home to Brooklyn and conjured up a puzzle that, in her words "stimulated the imagination and heightened the appreciation by reviewing classical English and American poetry and prose masters." In a mere six months she churned out a staggering 99 double-crostics and upon the suggestion of a friend submitted some to The Saturday Review, who promptly contracted with her for a series of these puzzles, the first appearing in 1934. Nine years later, in 1943, Kingsley’s creations also started appearing in the New York Times. While other writers have taken over creating these puzzles, starting with Kingsley's trusty assistant Doris Nash Wortman in 1953, they continue to appear in the Times to the present day, once every two weeks, in the Times' magazine section. The current creators, David Balton and Jane Stewart, are a married couple who surprised each other with a gift of a homemade double-crostic on their first wedding anniversary. (Now why didn’t Dan and I think of that?!) You can read more about David and Jane and and a whole lot more about New York Times double-crostics at the NYT Acrostics website. And of course you can now do these puzzles online but I don't see myself converting from the print version any time soon.
A 2020 Times article described the double-crostic puzzle as “a bit unsung. . . compared with its more mainstream relative, the crossword, but its fans are passionate.” Count me among those passionate fans!